I had the same error while trying to generate the pdf files from lyx. I did run sudo apt-get install texlive-lang-french and the error was resolved.
Now working fine. Update: These packages have become obsolete; texlive-lang-european should be installed now:. But with that remark every works again as before. Of course, you can replace german with your needed language, dutch, spanish or francais, as in the other answers. These packages have become obsolete; texlive-lang-european should be installed now:. I had the same problem for the Spanish language, only after reading I came to the conclusion that I had to install all the packages, and so I did for Elementary OS from the terminal:.
Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. Asked 8 years, 2 months ago. Active 7 months ago. Viewed k times. I recently updated my operating system from Ubuntu Either you misspelled it What should I do? Thank you in advance for your help. Either you misspelled it.
Improve this question. Olivier 23 6 6 bronze badges. The alternative is to map Modelica definitions into a directory structure. A package can be stored as a directory by creating a directory with the same name as the package.
Then, inside that directory, there must be a file called package. The nested definitions can be stored either as single files as described above or as directories representing packages as described in this paragraph. The following diagram attempts to visualize a sample directory layout:. The package. There are two important things to note here. First, the within clause should be present, but empty. This indicates that this package is not contained in any other packages. Those must be stored outside the package.
Similarly, the package. Again, there should be no definitions contained in this package, only annotations. You may need to enter updated or different credentials such as a smartcard.
This might be related to certificate-to-account mapping failure for the SA. IPsec DoS Protection failed to create state because the maximum number of entries allowed by policy has been reached. IPsec DoS Protection failed to create a per internal IP rate limit queue because the maximum number of queues allowed by policy has been reached.
The application has failed to start because its side-by-side configuration is incorrect. Please see the application event log or use the command-line sxstrace. A component version required by the application conflicts with another component version already active. Lack of system resources has required isolated activation to be disabled for the current thread of execution.
An attempt to set the process default activation context failed because the process default activation context was already set. The manifest for an assembly used by the application has a reference to a dependent assembly which is not installed.
The manifest has a default namespace specified on the assembly element but its value is not "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm. Two or more components referenced directly or indirectly by the application manifest have files by the same name. Two or more components referenced directly or indirectly by the application manifest have window classes with the same name.
Two or more components referenced directly or indirectly by the application manifest have proxies for the same COM interface IIDs. Two or more components referenced directly or indirectly by the application manifest are different versions of the same component which is not permitted. A component's file does not match the verification information present in the component manifest. Manifest Parse Error : Parameter entities cannot be used inside markup declarations in an internal subset.
Manifest Parse Error : The namespace prefix is not allowed to start with the reserved string "xml". Assembly Protection Error : The catalog for an assembly is not valid, or does not match the assembly's manifest.
The supplied assembly identity is missing one or more attributes which must be present in this context. The supplied assembly identity has one or more attribute names that contain characters not permitted in XML names. The identity string is malformed. After you install the chaincode package, you need to approve a chaincode definition for your organization.
The definition includes the important parameters of chaincode governance such as the name, version, and the chaincode endorsement policy. By default, this policy requires that a majority of channel members need to approve a chaincode before it can be used on a channel. Because we have only two organizations on the channel, and a majority of 2 is 2, we need approve a chaincode definition of asset-transfer basic as Org1 and Org2.
If an organization has installed the chaincode on their peer, they need to include the packageID in the chaincode definition approved by their organization. The package ID is used to associate the chaincode installed on a peer with an approved chaincode definition, and allows an organization to use the chaincode to endorse transactions. You can find the package ID of a chaincode by using the peer lifecycle chaincode queryinstalled command to query your peer.
The package ID is the combination of the chaincode label and a hash of the chaincode binaries. Every peer will generate the same package ID. Paste the package ID returned by peer lifecycle chaincode queryinstalled into the command below.
Note: The package ID will not be the same for all users, so you need to complete this step using the package ID returned from your command window in the previous step. Because the environment variables have been set to operate the peer CLI as the Org2 admin, we can approve the chaincode definition of asset-transfer basic as Org2.
Chaincode is approved at the organization level, so the command only needs to target one peer. The approval is distributed to the other peers within the organization using gossip. Approve the chaincode definition using the peer lifecycle chaincode approveformyorg command:. The command above uses the --package-id flag to include the package identifier in the chaincode definition. The --sequence parameter is an integer that keeps track of the number of times a chaincode has been defined or updated.
Because the chaincode is being deployed to the channel for the first time, the sequence number is 1. When the asset-transfer basic chaincode is upgraded, the sequence number will be incremented to 2. If you are using the low level APIs provided by the Fabric Chaincode Shim API, you could pass the --init-required flag to the command above to request the execution of the Init function to initialize the chaincode.
The first invoke of the chaincode would need to target the Init function and include the --isInit flag before you could use the other functions in the chaincode to interact with the ledger. We could have provided a --signature-policy or --channel-config-policy argument to the approveformyorg command to specify a chaincode endorsement policy. The endorsement policy specifies how many peers belonging to different channel members need to validate a transaction against a given chaincode.
Because we did not set a policy, the definition of asset-transfer basic will use the default endorsement policy, which requires that a transaction be endorsed by a majority of channel members present when the transaction is submitted.
This implies that if new organizations are added or removed from the channel, the endorsement policy is updated automatically to require more or fewer endorsements. In this tutorial, the default policy will require a majority of 2 out of 2 and transactions will need to be endorsed by a peer from Org1 and Org2. If you want to specify a custom endorsement policy, you can use the Endorsement Policies operations guide to learn about the policy syntax. You need to approve a chaincode definition with an identity that has an admin role.
You cannot approve a chaincode definition with a client user. The approval needs to be submitted to the ordering service, which will validate the admin signature and then distribute the approval to your peers. We still need to approve the chaincode definition as Org1. Set the following environment variables to operate as the Org1 admin:.
We now have the majority we need to deploy the asset-transfer basic the chaincode to the channel. While only a majority of organizations need to approve a chaincode definition with the default policies , all organizations need to approve a chaincode definition to start the chaincode on their peers.
If you commit the definition before a channel member has approved the chaincode, the organization will not be able to endorse transactions. As a result, it is recommended that all channel members approve a chaincode before committing the chaincode definition. After a sufficient number of organizations have approved a chaincode definition, one organization can commit the chaincode definition to the channel. If a majority of channel members have approved the definition, the commit transaction will be successful and the parameters agreed to in the chaincode definition will be implemented on the channel.
You can use the peer lifecycle chaincode checkcommitreadiness command to check whether channel members have approved the same chaincode definition. The flags used for the checkcommitreadiness command are identical to the flags used to approve a chaincode for your organization. However, you do not need to include the --package-id flag. The command will produce a JSON map that displays if a channel member has approved the parameters that were specified in the checkcommitreadiness command:.
Since both organizations that are members of the channel have approved the same parameters, the chaincode definition is ready to be committed to the channel. You can use the peer lifecycle chaincode commit command to commit the chaincode definition to the channel. The commit command also needs to be submitted by an organization admin.
The transaction above uses the --peerAddresses flag to target peer0. The commit transaction is submitted to the peers joined to the channel to query the chaincode definition that was approved by the organization that operates the peer.
0コメント